
It was a cherry program that we had been working to close for a year and we were almost done. We had agreed to the contract pricing and schedule, and then the Program Manager paused, smiled and dropped the bombshell: ”This program schedule is key. We realize it may not be possible, but we would like to incentivize you to deliver a month early.” If could have this on their dock by August 15th, we would receive an additional 5%. This was more than $75,000 in below the line, windfall-profit revenue if we could pull it off. Money on the ground. But it would take a heroic effort from a group of 3 or 4 on the team. The win-win was obvious; split the reward with the team. What could possibly go wrong?
Splitting financial incentives with those that create the result is powerful mojo. We found from doing it wrong it is also dangerous ground. Imagine for a moment 3 highly motivated company employees in the midst of 147 ticked off, resentful, what-about-when-I-busted-my-butt-and-didn’t-get-no-stinking-incentive company employees and you get the picture.
To make it work, think “Goldilocks” – not too much, not too little: Just right.
After years of trial and error we discovered three keys to achieving the necessary balance:
Balance the company-team split.
The team should get between 5 percent and 15 percent of the reward to the company. In general, less than 5 percent did not improve the result; greater than 15 percent was throwing money at the problem. But in that sweet spot between the two percentages, a lot can be accomplished.
Balance the priorities.
Deadline-oriented incentives can challenge quality systems. Look at the Challenger disaster in 1986 as a case in point: pressure to meet a schedule versus the safety of seven astronauts. Powerful schedule incentives can only be implemented within a balancing, rock solid quality context that cannot be compromised.
Balance the reward.
Resentment is created in a company when a particular program or team is called out to receive an incentive, particularly if this is a rare event. You can inoculate the company from this by sharing the reward with everyone in the company.
We tweaked the balance till we got it right. For us, it was two-thirds to the team or individual directly creating the result, one-third to the company. We also chose to share the company split evenly among the employees regardless of salary to further make the point that we were all pulling together.
This last piece made our incentives really sing. It gave us the ability to report progress-to-goal daily to the company, and have everyone pulling hard for the result whether they were on the team or not. Even though the reward to the non-team employees might have been small, the message sent made it a company goal rather than a team goal.
As with any powerful medicine, we used this sparingly to prevent a context of entitlement, but when we did, we had 100 percent of the company pulling out all the stops, and everyone celebrating the result when we succeeded.
And I’ll tell you what. When it all comes together, it is one sweet moment when you get to sign those checks and pass them out.
Scott


